|
The Hydrogen Economy
Why
hydrogen? Because hydrogen is a clean universal fuel that can be used
to power cars, trucks, planes, trains, buses, boats and ships.
Hydrogen
can heat homes and commercial buildings, and generate electricity. Hydrogen
can replace all forms of fossil fuels. A nation that has converted all
of its power systems to run on hydrogen will no longer be dependent on
oil because hydrogen can be extracted from water. Water molecules can
be separated into pure hydrogen and oxygen through the process of Electrolysis—using
electricity as the source of energy to drive the reaction. The electricity
can be produced from
many different sources of energy such as wind, solar,
biomass and geothermal as well as fossil and nuclear.
A nation powered by hydrogen will be free to choose from many sources
of energy, all of which will produce the one universal fuel: Hydrogen.
|
GM Sequel
- hydrogen fuel cell car
The
GM Sequel is the most recent step in General Motor's reinvention of the
automobile. Unveiled in 2005 at the North American International Auto Show
in Detroit,
it addresses
two critical milestones for customer acceptance: range and performance.
The GM Sequel has a 300 mile range and accelerates to 60 mph in under 10 seconds.
In the past three years GM has made
remarkable progress in fuel cell vehicle development. Sequel
is the next step forward. It may not be affordable – yet, but it
truly proves that it's doable.
GM
Unveils Second Propulsion System for Chevrolet Volt —E-Flex hydrogen
fuel cell continues move toward electric drive.
This second variant of the E-Flex system uses GM's new fifth-generation fuel
cell propulsion technology and a lithium-ion battery to provide up to 300
miles (483 km) of petroleum- and emissions-free electric driving. The fuel
cell E-Flex is a true Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) and operates all-electric
from both hydrogen fuel cell-generated electricity and grid electricity. It
is plug-in capable, adding up to 20 additional miles (34 km) each time it
is charged, further reducing trips to the refueling station.
GM to Launch World's Largest Fuel Cell Vehicle Fleet in 2007
The
Ford Focus FCV-Hybrid is powered by hydrogen and has a fuel cell instead
of a battery to produce electricity. The innovative powertrain combines
a Ni-MH high voltage battery with a hydrogen-powered fuel cell engine
to help increase performance and efficiency while still providing zero
emissions.
FORD Hydrogen Fuel Cell powered Explorer showcased at the 2006 LA Auto show
Ford Motor Company raised the bar in the hydrogen fuel cell race at the
November 26, 2006 Los Angeles Auto Show. Ford unveiled an all-new fuel
cell powered Explorer that can travel 350 miles on a single fill-up. The six-passenger
fuel cell Explorer is one of several vehicles with green technology that
Ford
showcased.
The fuel cell Explorer prototype is part of a series of vehicles partially funded
by a contract with the United States Department of Energy. The goal of the Technology
Demonstration Vehicle program
is to find a pathway for a fuel alternative to petroleum that has less environmental
impact than current powertrain technology.
Ford's
concept touring vehicle uses fuel cells
The Ford Airstream Concept car was unveiled at the 2007 North American
International Auto Show in Detroit.
The concept vehicle, unveiled at the
North American International Auto Show January 2007, operates under
electric power at all times, powered by a plug-in hydrogen hybrid
fuel cell
that gets the equivalent of 41 mpg. “This advanced fuel cell system
is half the weight and cost of today’s fuel cells and can operate
in the dead of winter,” Ford said in a statement. That’s a major step
forward because today’s
fuel cells don’t do well when the mercury dips below freezing. The fuel cell’s
sole function is to recharge the vehicle’s lithium-ion battery pack as needed.
This allows it to work like a portable generator, instead of an engine,
as had been the case in previous Ford fuel cell vehicles.
|
| In addition to its fuel cell initiative, Ford Motor
Company has developed new hydrogen powered internal combustion engines
(ICE) that perform as well as gasoline engines.
The new engines will allow Ford to take advantage of existing automobile
technology for mass production.
The
Ford Model U concept car (shown right) is powered by the new Ford hydrogen
ICE.
|
 |
Ford's
new tri-fuel engine
 |
The
Ford F-250 Super Chief pickup takes truck leadership to
a new level – as the world's first vehicle with Tri-Flex
fueling, enabling the supercharged V-10 to run for 500 miles between
fill-ups
on hydrogen, E85 ethanol or gasoline.
The transition from hydrogen
fuel power to either E85 or gasoline is handled seamlessly through
a dashboard-mounted switch and can occur while the vehicle is
in operation.
Transition from either E85 or gasoline to hydrogen requires that the
vehicle be at idle to allow for proper engagement of the supercharger,
which only operates when the
vehicle is powered by hydrogen.
Hydrogen is the ultimate clean fuel of the future. It is not only
the cleanest fuel, it is the most abundant element on Earth. And,
E85 ethanol is a domestic, renewable, greenhouse gas-friendly fuel.
|
Links:
Hydrogen Vehicles
Driving the fuel-cell cars of tomorrow
Behind the Wheel - Honda FCX Concept
— Consumer Reports drove the FCX Concept fuel-cell vehicle in Washington, D.C., at a Honda event attended by about 25 other journalists.
Daimler and Ford Like Fuel Cells So Much, They Bought the Company
Setting a World Driving Record with Hydrogen — Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
The Cost of American Energy Independence
— Yes we can do it now.
Pure hydrogen gas does not exist as a natural resource like oil. You
cannot drill for hydrogen or discover it anywhere as a pure gas. Hydrogen
must be extracted from some other natural resource like water, methane,
biomass, coal or oil. In order to extract hydrogen from these natural
resources energy must be spent. For
this reason, Hydrogen is considered a carrier of energy like
electricity, or a store for energy like a battery, rather than a source
of energy
like oil.
Therefore, an important question remains unanswered: Will the hydrogen
gas that
powers the new hydrogen ICE and fuel cell cars be made from imported
fossil fuels or from America’s
own natural resources? Hydrogen produced in America, from America's
natural resources, would free the U.S.A. from dependence
on foreign oil.
Hydrogen is superior to gasoline because hydrogen can be extracted from
many different natural resources. Gasoline is superior to hydrogen because
gasoline is easier to store, transport and handle.
Filling a fuel tank with hydrogen is not as easy as filling a tank with
gasoline. The energy density (amount of energy for a given volume) of
liquid hydrocarbons such as gasoline or diesel is much greater than the
energy density of either compressed or liquid hydrogen. Storage of hydrogen
gas is believed to be one of the most difficult challenges facing the
hydrogen economy.
The problem is the difference in Energy Density between hydrogen
and gasoline. It takes 2.2
pounds of hydrogen to equal the energy in one gallon of gasoline.
Hydrogen is a gas, not a liquid like gasoline. Getting 2.2 pounds of hydrogen
into a one gallon container is a very serious challenge. Many of the world’s
best scientists are working to solve the problem.
Lincoln Composites,
has developed a storage
tank that may solve the problem by holding compressed hydrogen
at 10,000 PSI. (See also, Dynetek)
Many techniques are being explored:
- Carbon nanotubes
may hold the answer. Scientists are researching the possibility of storing
and transporting hydrogen inside of porous metal powders: Carbon Nanotubes
would work like a sponge to store hydrogen gas.
- New magnesium
alloys can also absorb hydrogen like a sponge, store it safely
for long periods and release it on demand when either the pressure
or temperature
is varied.
- Tiny glass micro spheres smaller than a grain of sand may sove the
problem: Researchers
envision tiny spheres storing hydrogen gas in cars.
- A revolutionary method of using concentrated solar energy for producing
hydrogen in a clean, safe and inexpensive way was developed by a
cooperation of scientists from Israel, Sweden, Switzerland and France.
This new method,
based on the production of pure zinc, may enable an easier and quicker
move to a hydrogen-based economy.
ZINC POWDER WILL DRIVE YOUR HYDROGEN CAR
- Crystals may be the ultimate answer. Scientists have created a chemical
structure that has the largest internal surface area ever observed
in
a porous metal-organic material. Researchers at Michigan
and Arizona State University have created a
new porous crystal with an estimated surface area of 4500 meters
squared per gram. The crystal can bind large quantities of hydrogen
gas and may
have potential for use as a hydrogen storage tank in transportation
vehicles. See: “Crystal sponge” a
hydrogen breakthrough?
- Another company, Millennium
Cell, has developed a hydrogen Borax liquid fuel called Hydrogen on
Demand™, a very promising techology.
- Chemical
Hydrogen Storage offers great potential.
Summary of Hydrogen Storage Challenges
NREL Scientists
Take On Hydrogen Storage: "The real challenge of hydrogen storage
is finding a way to store enough of it to make it worthwhile—enough
to fuel a vehicle for its required driving range, within the constraints
of weight, volume, efficiency, and cost."
Transporting hydrogen from where it is made to where it will be consumed
is also a challenge. Another challenge is public safety when handling
hydrogen. Visualize yourself filling your tank with hydrogen; what do
you see? Is it compressed to 10,000 PSI? Or is it liquid at minus 423
degrees Fahrenheit? Would you want to handle that?
The H prize — The
Hydrogen prize is modeled after the X Prize, which spurred the first
privately funded suborbital human spaceflight.
The goal of the “H” prize is to develop the most non-governmental
way to break through to a hydrogen economy. “We want to harness
the power
of American ‘can do’ spirit and innate human competitive
drive. A hydrogen economy can be closer than we think if we inspire
some innovation. We in government need to show a commitment similar
to President
Kennedy’s commitment to the moon launch and a threat awareness
similar to the awareness that drove the Manhattan project,” said
U.S. House Science Research Subcommittee former Chairman
Bob Inglis (R-SC).
The H-Prize bill includes three prize categories:
- Technological advancements – Four $1 million prizes awarded annually
in the categories of hydrogen production, storage, distribution and
utilization.
- Prototypes – One $4 million prize awarded every other year
for the creation of a working hydrogen vehicle prototype.
- Transformation technologies – A maximum $100 million prize
-- $10 million in cash and up to $90 million in matching funds for
private capital --
would be awarded for changes in hydrogen technologies that meet or exceed
objective criteria in production and distribution to the consumer.
“Suddenly, the whole nation is focused on gas prices and our ‘addiction
to oil’ and
the Congress is in a panic trying to figure out how to respond,” said
former Science Committee Chairman Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY). “Our
options in the immediate future are limited, but our options in the mid-term
and
long-term are not.
“The hydrogen economy holds out great promise but it also presents
great hurdles. We are pretty far away from knowing how to create, store,
distribute and use hydrogen cleanly and efficiently.
We need to devote all the ingenuity we can muster to attack this problem.
That’s why I was so pleased when Chairman Inglis introduced H.R. 5143 – an
innovative approach to encouraging innovative research. The bill is
carefully crafted both to encourage ongoing work that can
lead to incremental improvements in hydrogen technology, and to draw
more scientists and engineers into trying to remove the highest hurdles
on the hydrogen highway.”
BP,
GM see hydrogen in their future — Companies agree that renewable energy is the future fuel of choice, but pursue a variety of options in the meantime.
Cheap
Hydrogen Fuel — GE says its new machine could make the hydrogen economy affordable, by
slashing the cost of water-splitting technology.
A Big Moment for
GE’s Electrolyzer Team
— Electrolyzers have been around for a while: the problem is that they
are very expensive to build. Between the energy cost and the cost to buy
the equipment you end up having to pay 3-4 times as much for
the hydrogen than an equivalent amount of gasoline. So how do we make hydrogen cheaper? Raising the efficiency is good, but
even at 100% efficiency it still would cost too much because of the equipment.
So we make the electrolyzer cost less.
GM
developing home hydrogen refueling device — By Chris Woodyard,
USA TODAY “General Motors
is building a prototype for a home hydrogen refueling unit in hope of selling
fuel-cell cars by 2011. The unit, which would make hydrogen using
either electricity or sunlight,
would help sidestep one of the most vexing problems surrounding the creation
of the pollution-free, alternative-power cars: how to persuade oil companies
to invest in expensive new hydrogen stations that would compete with their
core product, gasoline. The automaker's goal is an affordable, compact
unit that would allow customers to fill their cars overnight in their own
garages, says GM spokesman Scott Fosgard.”
Driving
GM's New Hydrogen Car — By John Voelcker,
The radical thing about Chevy's hydrogen concept car is how normal
it feels to drive.
Research
at Boston University —Magnesium
hydride slurry, a liquid in which hydrogen gas can be temporarily “locked
up.” The advantage, is that hydrogen gas can be stored
in a slurry at standard temperature and atmospheric conditions, then
released merely by adding water.
The many challenges facing the hydrogen economy,
along with many proposed solutions, are presented and explained by
Physicist Armory Lovins in Twenty
Hydrogen Myths, a 50 page PDF document that can be downloaded from
the Rocky Mountain Institute
web site.
Amory
Lovins's Hydrogen Primer is a highly condensed
version of "Twenty Hydrogen Myths".
THE
TRUTH ABOUT HYDROGEN — Wild promises abound, but can the simplest
element in the universe really power our homes, fuel our cars and reduce
our contribution to global warming? The November, 2006 issue of Popular
Mechanics crunches the numbers on the real hydrogen economy. BY Jeff
Wise
Opposing views:
A rebuttal to Armory Lovins Twenty Hydrogen Myths-
I agree that hydrogen
looks good on the surface. Unfortunately, once you delve deeper than
that, it begins to make absolutely no sense. The energy that you get
from burning a hydrocarbon fuel comes from the hydrogen in the fuel
- so, several decades ago, engineers started thinking "why not just
separate out the hydrogen, so you wouldn't have to carry around all
those carbons". That approach makes a lot of sense for rockets - where
the most important thing is minimizing the mass. NASA can handle extremely
expensive and inefficient-to-produce forms of fuel, since they have
a huge budget. Minimizing mass is most important to them (for rockets,
it's the mass that's most important - it doesn't matter if the fuel
has a very low energy density so you need an enormous fuel tank, as
long as the energy per unit mass can be kept low). Plus, the additional
danger isn't all that important, since rockets are very dangerous to
begin with. The problem is, that approach (wanting to not carry the
carbons with the fuel) is utterly useless with automobiles. You have
to use a lot of energy (and money) to extract the hydrogen from the
fuel feedstock (whether biomass, fossil fuel, or water), and end up
with a very undesirable fuel for automobiles - a very hard to contain
gas with extremely low energy density. So, you have to compress or liquify
it to get a reasonable energy density (or store it in a solid form,
which ends up being considerably less efficient than even liquifying
it).
What the hydrogen proponents
like Amory Lovins ignore is that compressed or liquified hydrogen is
orders of magnitude more dangerous than uncompressed hydrogen. In Lovins'
"20 myths about hydrogen", in #2 he claims that hydrogen is perfectly
safe due to it being lighter than air, dispersing rapidly, and (the
utterly false claim) that it requires a container of oblong shape to
detonate. The first two are true of uncompressed hydrogen - it IS lighter
than air, and disperses rapidly. The problem is, compressed or liquified
hydrogen is not lighter than air, and does not disperse rapidly. With
compressed hydrogen, a leak escapes with enough velocity that the static
electricity is almost always enough to ignite the fuel, and it can not
be extinguished (you can douse the leak with water continually, but
the hydrogen will just continually reignite due to static electricity.
And in fact, in the accidents involving hydrogen tankers that sprung
leaks at valves, fire departments always had to continually douse the
tanker all over with water until the hydrogen burned itself off (sometimes
taking a full day to do so in a tanker), to prevent the tank from heating
up enough to explode - which could level city blocks due to the stored
mechanical energy in the highly compressed gas, not even counting the
hydrogen igniting/detonating. Liquid hydrogen can be just as dangerous
- do a search on Google for "BLEVE" - Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor
Explosion.
The main underlying
problem with the hydrogen economy is that those carbons in the feedstock
that you separate the hydrogen from serve some very useful purposes.
They allow the fuel to have a much higher volumetric energy density
(which is what matters for automobiles - not the mass energy density,
which only matters for rockets), and depending on the type, can give
it a very low volatility, high flash point, and simply make it far safer
and more practical. So, why expend all that energy (and money) separating
the hydrogen from those carbons, just to end up with a less desirable
fuel? Consider this - for the most part, hydrogen is produced
by extracting it from something else that could be turned into a liquid
fuel far more easily (i.e. biomass, petroleum, coal, etc.) or from natural
gas.
Michael
S. Briggs
UNH Physics Department
A growing number of scientists are warning that valuable time
and money is being wasted on hydrogen research-
The Hydrogen Hoax By Robert
Zubrin, Ph.D.
The Hydrogen
"Illusion" By Ulf Bossel, Ph.D.
Fuel
Cell Efficiency: A Reality Check by Physicist Dominic Crea.
The Physics
of the Hydrogen Economy By Ulf Bossel, Ph.D.
Renewables, Not Hydrogen, Is The Answer By David Doty, Ph.D.
Hydrogen vehicle won't be viable soon, MIT study says
The Future
of the Hydrogen Economy: Bright or Bleak?
—By Ulf Bossel, Baldur Eliasson and Gordon Taylor
(Downloads a 39 page (240 KB) Adobe PDF document.)
The World
Needs a Sustainable Energy Economy, not a Hydrogen Economy By Ulf
Bossel, Ph.D.
Reviewing the Hydrogen Fuel and FreedomCAR Initiatives By Dr. Joseph
Romm
—Former Acting Assistant Secretary of Energy and
Author, The Hype about Hydrogen (Island Press,
March 2004)
(Downloads a 10 page (60 KB) Adobe PDF document.)
A Better Way to Get From Here to There: A Commentary on the Hydrogen
Economy and a Proposal for an Alternative Strategy
Hydrogen Fuel Cell cars are being road tested, but probably
won't be affordable for most drivers for at least ten years-
The challenges to reach a hydrogen economy, however, are enormous,
considering today’s state of knowledge and technical capabilities.
The hydrogen economy consists of many physical and chemical processes
linked in an interdependent network that connects production, distribution,
storage, and use. Hydrogen in its various forms flows throughout the
network, linking primary sources like hydrocarbons or seawater to storage
media like alanates to end-use functions like fuel cells. Many of the
processes in the network have been demonstrated in laboratory or prototype
tests at some level, but nearly all of these processes remain to be
proved in competitive environments against existing technology for cost,
performance, and reliability.
The gap between present-day technology and commercial viability
is vast. To be economically competitive with the present fossil fuel
economy, the cost of fuel cells must be lowered by a factor of 10 or
more, the cost of producing hydrogen by a factor of 4, and the performance
and reliability of hydrogen technology for transportation and other
uses must be improved dramatically (Abraham 2003). This gap cannot be
bridged by incremental advances of the present state of the art. Bridging
the gap requires not only creative engineering, but also revolutionary
conceptual breakthroughs in understanding and controlling the physical
and chemical processes that govern the interaction of hydrogen with
materials. Such breakthroughs can only come from comprehensive basic
research focused on the behavior of hydrogen at the atomic level, exploiting
the remarkable recent advances in materials synthesis capabilities,
forefront characterization tools, and creative theory and modeling.
The best scientists from universities and national laboratories and
the best engineers and scientists from industry must work in interdisciplinary
groups to find breakthrough solutions to the fundamental problems of
hydrogen production, storage, and use.
The formulation of such a basic research program must be coordinated
with the needs of applied research and development and have coupled
experimental and theoretical components for maximum impact. The hope
is that these discoveries and related conceptual breakthroughs from
basic research will provide a foundation for the innovative design of
materials and processes that will produce qualitative improvements in
the performance, cost, and reliability of the production, storage, and
use of hydrogen so that an economically competitive hydrogen economy
can eventually be realized.
As we ponder the benefits of a hydrogen economy, we also must consider
other factors. The time scale required to develop the technology and
the infrastructure needed to produce the amount of hydrogen required
for a hydrogen economy is significant. In recognition of this long-term
focus, we must consider complementary routes for achieving significant
energy savings and environmental benefits in the near term, such as
internal combustion/electric hybrid vehicles.
-Excerpt from Basic
Research Needs for the Hydrogen Economy
A 178 page report from Argonne
National Laboratory, funded by the Office
of Science at the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
The report is a 7.5 MB Adobe PDF document.
Alternative Zero Emission fuels:
Hydrogen Peroxide and Sugar
— The carbon in the sugar is renewable, therefore "climate
neutral" because the CO2 would be recycled
from the atmosphere when new biomass is grown to supply more sugar.
Boron: A Better Energy Carrier than Hydrogen
— by Graham Cowan
—
Zinc Air Fuel Cell Technology
—
eVionyx metal fuel Technology
—
Running on Iron Metal nanoparticles show promise as future fuels.
—
Hydrogen Power Inc. patented technology called Hydrogen Now™ which is
based on a simple reaction of aluminum and water. The aluminum “splits” the water
freeing the hydrogen and creating a benign byproduct of aluminum hydroxide (non-toxic, non-caustic, and recyclable).
—
Aluminum in your car tank Purdue professor claims hydrogen breakthrough: A Purdue University engineer and
National Medal of Technology winner says he's ready and able to start a revolution in clean energy.
Professor Jerry Woodall and students have invented a way to use an aluminum alloy to extract hydrogen from
water — a process that could replace gasoline as well as its pollutants
and emissions tied to global warming.
Hydrogen References:
Hydrogen Cars
Why Hydrogen?
Hydrogen Basics
Fool for fuel cells
DOE
Hydrogen info
California
Hydrogen Highways
Army signs up for hydrogen hybrid
Building a Hydrogen Transportation System
Hydrogen can be element of automotive revolution
ECD-Ovonics Tests Solid Storage Technology in Toyota Prius Hybrid
U.S. State Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Policy and Demonstration Database
FORD CELEBRATES PRODUCTION OF HYDROGEN-POWERED FOCUS FUEL CELL VEHICLE
Hydrogen web sites:
H Prize News
Think Hydrogen
Safe Hydrogen
www.virent.com
www.fuelcells.org
www.fuelcelltoday.com
www.hydrogen.energy.gov
www.hydrogenforecast.com
www.hydrogenconference.org
www.hydrogenassociation.org
California Zero Emission Vehicle Program
Recommended reading:
Our Energy Challenge
by Nobel Laureate Dr. Richard E. Smalley
Zero Interest Financing —Investment Capital for American Energy Independence
Projects
|