Fuel Efficiency
Fuel efficiency means to do more with less. Efficiency is achieved by
improving technology, so that less energy is consumed while getting the
same or better results. A new automobile that gets better gas mileage
without reducing power or performance is an example of how advances in
technology can save energy by increasing efficiency, rather than relying
on conservation (reduced performance or restricted use) as the
only way to save energy.

Some
people like to fool themselves by thinking that a larger gas tank is the
same as higher gas mileage. But if gasoline shortages occur, caused by
either a
natural or deliberate disaster—or another oil embargo, fuel prices will
spike again, everyone will be subjected to gas rationing, and a larger
fuel tank
will
not help.
When
the world economy recovers from the current economic recession, and
if world oil supply cannot meet growing demand, experts predict the
price of gasoline will quickly return to $4 per gallon and could soar to
$6. This prediction does not consider an actual
oil supply interruption — this
prediction assumes global oil production remains steady, but demand
continues to push supply to its limits — a scenario which
makes the possibility of a supply interruption very real.
During the
Arab oil embargo of 1973-74 and the Iranian Revolution of 1979-80, Americans
were subjected to gasoline rationing and long gas lines
at the gas station. As a result, gas guzzling cars and trucks were called “Gas
Hogs” and their value dropped to nearly zero.
Today,
people who own SUV’s
and pickup trucks are hurting — $4
gasoline caused the value of their SUV’s and trucks to drop
faster than the value of their homes. The gas guzzling cars and trucks
are
not selling — GM
and Ford have cut production of large vehicles, and many autoworkers
whose jobs depended on SUV and Truck sales are
now unemployed.
And, the amazing thing is that all of this has occurred without any
real shortage or interruption in the supply of oil. If a real shortage
occurred, gas prices would spike beyond $6 and reach $10-$15 per gallon
overnight. Americans would be faced once again with gasoline rationing.
If gasoline rationing forces drivers to wait two hours or more in long
gas lines before taking their turn at the pump, drivers will add the
value of their time to the price they pay for gas. Fuel efficiency is
not only about the price of gas; it is also about how far you can drive
on a limited amount of gas.
Fuel efficient cars and trucks will help protect families from the rising
cost of gasoline and will also ease the pain of any future fuel shortage
or
gas rationing.

A typical gasoline powered automobile is only about 25% efficient.
In other words, out of the 100% thermal energy potential of a gallon of
gasoline, only about 25% of the energy is converted to real mechanical
work that turns the wheels of the car — the other 75% is lost in
the form of wasted heat and friction.
Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE)
The United States Congress enacted legislation in 1975 requiring the doubling
of fuel efficiency for new cars. Today that Legislation is known as the
Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) standards. The CAFE standards
were increased again in the 2007 Energy Bill.
The CAFE standards focus on a Manufacturer’s fleet average fuel
economy, rather than on specific vehicle models. As a result, large “loopholes” exist
in the law undermining the goal of the law.
The following paragraphs describe key elements for a new Fuel Efficiency
Standard
The enactment of a Model Average Fuel Efficiency (MAFE) standard, replacing
the CAFE standard, would eliminate loopholes and give manufacturers specific
goals and guidelines for each vehicle model.
Under a MAFE standard, fuel economy would no longer be expressed in miles
per gallon (mpg). The MAFE would be expressed in miles per 100 million
joules (MPJ), where the ‘J’ in MPJ would represent 100 megajoules.
[Miles per ‘J’ = MPJ = miles per 100 million joules.]
The joule
is the International Standard unit of energy. The gallon is an
old English measure for a volume of liquid, which says nothing about energy.
The CAFE
is, of course, concerned about gasoline consumption and a gallon
of gasoline is a common term recognized by all U.S. drivers, but it is
not very scientific.
Measuring fuel efficiency by MPJ instead of MPG would level the
playing field between gasoline and alcohol fuels.
Gasoline versus Methanol:
The energy content of one gallon of conventional gasoline is approximately
122 megajoules (LHV*). The energy content of one gallon of methanol
is approximately 60 megajoules (LHV).
*LHV=Low Heating Value.
Gasoline's LHV should be compared with the LHV of Methanol. Low
heating values are based on the assumption that the
energy in the exhaust waste heat cannot be used. This is true for
cars. (For home heating the heat in the water vapor can be captured
and used,
so HHV* is appropriate. *HHV=High Heating Value.)
An Alcohol Engine will
produce 30-40% greater fuel efficiency than a gasoline engine, yet
a gallon of methanol will still deliver fewer miles per gallon
than gasoline. However, if the two fuels are compared using miles
per 100 megajoules (MPJ), then methanol will deliver 30-40% better
mileage
than gasoline when fueling an Alcohol engine and will exhaust 30-40%
less carbon dioxide per mile than gasoline.
Methanol is a preferred fuel for race cars because
it is safer and produces greater combustion horsepower, per unit
of fuel energy (measured in BTU’s or Joules), than gasoline when powering
an engine optimized for alcohol.
Unlike race cars, the spark ignition internal combustion engines in automobiles
are optimized for gasoline, not alcohol, because gasoline was significantly
cheaper than alcohol and widely available for most of the 20th century.
However, when the retail price of gasoline rises above $2 per gallon,
methanol made from non-petroleum hydrocarbons will cost U.S. drivers less
than gasoline
(based on miles driven per dollar spent for fuel).
Opposition to expanding methanol production for the purpose of replacing
gasoline is entirely political, there are no technology barriers—methanol
can be produced from USA natural gas, biomass, coal and oil shale on a
scale equal to the current volume of gasoline consumed in the United States.
Methanol is produced worldwide today using natural gas or coal
as the base carbon source (feedstock). Technology also exists
for large scale production of methanol from biomass. And, catalysts
are currently being developed that will soon allow a shift from
methanol to synthetic ethanol production.
The MAFE standard would not reward a manufacturer for producing an alternative
fuel or flex fuel vehicle (incentives would be given through other statutes).
The MAFE standard would apply only to vehicles that consume carbon based
liquid fuels. The MAFE would not apply to electric vehicles or plug-in
electric vehicles (PHEV’s).
The MAFE standard would apply to the fuel economy of a hybrid electric
vehicle (HEV) in city traffic,
but “potential” mileage gain estimates for a PHEV would not
be included in the MAFE measurement for a given vehicle model (PHEV
incentives would come through other statutes). The reason why PHEV's
would not
receive special MAFE treatment is because drivers might not bother
to plug them in — a problem similar to flex-fuel vehicles that received
special CAFE “credits” although it was well known
that drivers were not filling
up their
tanks with E85.
Flex-fuel vehicles should be mandated for all spark ignition engines that
use gasoline, rather than attempting to manipulate manufacturers
through granting adjustments to fuel efficiency standards as incentive
to produce alternative fuel vehicles.
Overemphasis on vehicle
mileage has caused manufacturers to produce smaller and smaller cars
in order to reduce the weight of the vehicle; an unintended
consequence is increased risk of injury during an accident. In order
to give manufacturers an incentive to make safe family size fuel
efficient cars, MPJ (miles per 100 megajoule) would not be the only
measure for the MAFE standard. The MAFE requirement for a given vehicle
model
would also set targets
for the size and
weight of the vehicle, related to the number of passengers
that can sit comfortably in the vehicle.
American families want a large family car or van, unfortunately a four-wheel
enclosed motorcycle (tiny car) isn’t going to give them what they
want. The weight of a vehicle can be significantly reduced without reducing
the size of the vehicle; this can be accomplished by replacing the steel
body and interior steel parts with fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composite
material, which is 60% lighter and 600% stiffer than steel.
The MAFE standard would set an objective for automobile manufacturers
to produce a seven passenger family vehicle that gets 40 miles per
100 megajoules (MPJ) with outstanding safety, comfort and performance,
built with
ultra-light advanced composites to reduce weight without reducing
size. The vehicle mileage calculations would not be adjusted
for any “alternative” fuel
or plug-in capability—the mileage would be based on real miles driven
in city traffic, powered by the fuel type: gasoline, diesel or alcohol.
If a large family car or van can achieve the MAFE goal of 40 MPJ,
calculated without the aid of PHEV enhanced mileage gains, then an
80 MPJ “tiny car” would certainly be possible too, which means
that when PHEV capability is added to the vehicle model, the carbonless
mileage contributed by the plug-in battery would begin where the
vehicle’s
MAFE target ends — a win for the family and a win for the environment.
Automobiles in the USA consume about 140 billion gallons
of gasoline per year — gasoline burned in automobiles accounts
for over forty-five percent of total U.S. oil consumption (9 million
barrels
per
day).
The United
States
imports 6 million
barrels of crude oil per day from OPEC nations. By replacing gasoline
with non-petroleum American made alcohol fuels, the USA would completely
eliminate dependence on OPEC oil—and set an example for the world
to follow. Current U.S. fuel ethanol production capacity exceeds ten billion gallons
per year. Fuel ethanol produced in the United States today is made primarily
from corn starch by the process of fermentation and alcohol distillation.
In the future, fuel ethanol will be made from non-food biomass, using
advanced technology that will extract sugar molecules from the cellulose
portion of biomass fiber—a technology that has not been demonstrated
at commercial scale. Yet there is no reason to wait—if synthetic
alcohol is added to the mix, America has the resources required to completely
replace gasoline now.
References:
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)
CAFE Overview - Frequently Asked Questions

|